Implementation of Shor’s algorithm with a single photon in 32 dimensions

Hao-Cheng Weng and Chih-Sung Chuu
Phys. Rev. Applied 22, 034003 – Published 3 September 2024

Abstract

Photonics has been a promising platform for implementing quantum technologies owing to its scalability and robustness. In this paper, we demonstrate the encoding of information in 32 time bins or dimensions of a single photon. A practical scheme for manipulating the single photon in high dimensions is experimentally realized to implement a compiled version of Shor’s algorithm on a single photon. Our work demonstrates the powerful information-processing capacity of a high-dimensional quantum system for complex quantum information tasks.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 November 2023
  • Revised 14 May 2024
  • Accepted 13 August 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.034003

© 2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & TechnologyAtomic, Molecular & OpticalCondensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Hao-Cheng Weng*,‡ and Chih-Sung Chuu

  • *Contact author: haocheng.weng@bristol.ac.uk
  • Contact author: cschuu@phys.nthu.edu.tw
  • Present address: Quantum Engineering Technology Laboratories and H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, UK.

Article Text

I. INTRODUCTION

The ability to encode information on single photons has changed how information can be processed or transferred fundamentally, enabling advanced technologies such as quantum communication or quantum computing [1–5]. Empowered by this ability, a global network capable of exchanging information between quantum devices is now being envisioned [6]. The scalability of such a quantum network will hence be strictly limited by how much information a photon can carry.

To encode a large quantity of information on a photon, one may harness various degrees of freedom (DOF) of a single photon, including the optical angular momentum, frequency bins, or time bins [7–14]. Alternatively, the information can be encoded in high dimensions [15–21], such as the optical modes of a single physical DOF. It is also proposed that, with the computational space largely expanded by the high-dimensional encoding, powerful information processing can be realized with only “one” photon in high dimensions [22–26]. Nevertheless, precise control over various optical properties in large dimensions is very challenging at the single-photon level. The experimental implementation of quantum algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm using one high-dimensional photon alone has never been achieved.

In this paper, we explore the information encoding and manipulation of a high-dimensional single photon in a single physical DOF. We demonstrate the encoding of information on a temporally long single photon across 32 time bins or dimensions, which is the largest reported to date for a time-bin-encoded single photon. The high-dimensional quantum state is efficiently prepared by modulating the single-photon wave packet in a single shot. By manipulating the high-dimensional single-photon state with a compact interferometry and time-resolved detection, we experimentally realize a compiled version of Shor’s algorithm [27–30] and the factorization of the integer 15 using a single photon for the first time. Shor’s algorithm [31] is the most sophisticated quantum algorithm with an exponential speedup on the factorization problem. Our work thus demonstrates not only the astonishing information capacity of a single photon but also the powerful information processing of a single photon in high dimensions.

II. THE QUANTUM CIRCUIT

The compiled version of Shor’s algorithm [27–30] is designed to find the prime factors of a specific integer 𝑁 or, equivalently, the order 𝑟 of 𝑎modulo𝑁 such that 1𝑟<𝑁 and 𝑎𝑟1mod𝑁 for any coprime integers 𝑎 and 𝑁. The algorithm consists of three steps. The register initialization prepares the first (argument) register in an equal coherent superposition state,

|0𝑛|0𝑚12𝑛2𝑛1𝑥=0|𝑥|0𝑚1|1.
(1)

The modular exponentiation then produces the highly entangled state,

12𝑛2𝑛1𝑥=0|𝑥|𝑎𝑥mod𝑁
(2)

by applying the order-finding function 𝑎𝑥mod𝑁 to the second (function) register when the argument register is in the state |𝑥. Finally, the inverse quantum Fourier transform (QFT) is applied to the argument register,

12𝑛2𝑛1𝑦=02𝑛1𝑥=0𝑒2𝜋𝑖𝑥𝑦/2𝑛|𝑦|𝑎𝑥mod𝑁,
(3)

followed by the measurement in the computational basis to find the interference peak at |𝑦 with 𝑦=𝑐2𝑛/𝑟.

To encode the computational basis states on a single photon, we exploit the time-bin modes 𝑑𝑗 within its temporal wave packet,

2𝑛𝑗=1𝑐𝑗|𝑑𝑗=𝑐1|000+𝑐2|001++𝑐2𝑛1|110+𝑐2𝑛|111,
(4)

where 2𝑛 is the number of dimensions and 𝑐𝑗 is the probability amplitude of the 𝑗th time-bin mode. To manipulate the time-bin modes, the single photon is prepared in an equal superposition state before entering a loop structure of programmable phase shifters and time-bin mode couplers (Fig. 1). The phase shifter implements the phase modulation 𝑒𝑖𝜙 for individual time-bin mode. The time-bin mode coupler, composed of sequential operations of full polarization rotation (pol. switch), time-bin displacement (time delay), and partial polarization rotation, couples different time-bin modes 𝑑𝑛 and 𝑑𝑚 [32] as follows:

(𝑑𝑛𝑑𝑚)=(1𝐶𝐶𝐶1𝐶)(𝑑𝑛𝑑𝑚),
(5)

where 𝐶 is the coupling strength. Consider a constant time delay such that the mode coupling exists only between the nearest-neighboring time-bin modes. The repeated operations structured in Fig. 1(b), where the blue (red) lines represents the phase shifters (mode couplers), generates arbitrary state in the form of Eq. (4) [32–34]. If more efficient coupling between the “far-away” time-bin modes is needed, tunable time-bin displacement can be exploited as shown in Fig. 1(c).

FIG. 1.

(a) Example for manipulating a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes. “Phase” and “Pol.” represent the electro-optic phase and polarization modulators, respectively. The time-bin modes with different phases, which are in one of two orthogonal polarizations, are labeled in different colors. The time delay is implemented in one polarization as indicated by its color. (b) The interferometry after several rounds for a constant time delay and nearest-neighboring mode coupling prepares arbitrary qudit states. The states |𝑑 are in the 𝑑-level Hilbert space. (c) The mode coupling with variable time delays. (d) Single-qubit unitary rotations 𝑈0, 𝑈1, and 𝑈2 for a three-qubit state |𝑞2𝑞1𝑞0 encoded on eight time-bin modes. (e) Realization of the rotational gates with a single-round operation acting on a qubit state. (f) Two-qubit control unitary gates 𝐶_𝑈𝑐𝑡 for a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes. and stand for the control and target qubits, respectively. (g) Realization of the gate for a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes.

The elementary gates can be realized with the phase shifters and mode couplers. Consider a three-qubit state encoded in eight time-bin modes. The single-qubit unitary operations is realized in Fig. 1(d). Targeted on different qubit, the operation is implemented by the mode coupling with different time-bin displacements. For arbitrary single-qubit gates, which can be decomposed into the single-qubit rotations and , the programmable phase shift and mode-coupling operations in Fig. 1(e) are employed. For general two-qubit control unitary operations, the realization for a three-qubit state encoded in eight time-bin modes is shown in Fig. 1(f). The time-bin displacement is again dependent on the target qubit. As an example, Fig. 1(g) shows how for a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes can be implemented by swapping the states and .

Figure 2 shows the quantum circuit used for our implementation of Shor’s algorithm with and . The state is initialized to

(6)

after the register initialization and evolves into

(7)

after the modular exponentiation. Since for natural numbers , the inverse QFT can be carried out by the classical processing [28–30,35].

FIG. 2.

Quantum circuit for implementing the compiled version of Shor’s algorithm that factorizes 15. , , and are the argument registers while and are the function registers. is the phase shift .

III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

The experimental setup for implementing Shor’s algorithm is illustrated in Fig. 3. Type-II phase-matched bipthons are generated by the doubly resonant parametric down-conversion in a monolithic PPKTP crystal [36,37]. By pumping the crystal with a cw laser at 775 nm, the detection of one photon heralds a single photon at 1550 nm. The wave packet of the heralded single photon, measured by the time-resolved coincidence counting and shown in Fig. 5(a), has a coherence time of 148 ns with a bandwidth of 2.7 MHz [38] and pair-generation rate of . The temporally long wave packet not only enables the manipulation of the time-bin modes by electro-optic modulators (2-dB insertion loss) [39–45] but also allows us to initialize the state in Eq. (6) by the electro-optic amplitude modulation in just one shot. This shows the advantage of using narrowband single photons to generate a large number of time bins as compared to multipassing the loop structure [34,46,47] in terms of the setup complexity and scalability. It is also worth noting that, to prepare the initial state in Eq. (6), no phase modulation is needed as all the time bins are in phase.

FIG. 3.

Experimental setup of the implementation of Shor’s algorithm in a single photon. The monolithic PPKTP crystal is pumped by a frequency-locked cw laser at 775 nm to generate type-II phase-matched biphotons. The half-wave plate (HWP) aligns the pump polarization to the crystal. A pair of lenses is used to focus the pump beam into the crystal. The long-pass filter (LPF) is placed to filter out the pump. After the polarizing beam splitter (PBS) splits the generated biphoton, the heralded 1550-nm single photons are sent into the fiber-based interferometry for implementing Shor’s algorithm, where AEOM, Pol. EOM, and SPD stand for the electro-optic amplitude modulator, electro-optic polarization modulator (switch), and single-photon detector (15% quantum efficiency, 150-ps timing resolution), respectively. A 200-ns optical delay is used for delaying the single photons.

FIG. 4.

Characterization of the single-qubit rotations and cnot gate. (a) Single-qubit rotation 𝑒𝑖𝜙ˆ𝜎𝑦. (b) Single-qubit rotation 𝑒𝑖𝜙ˆ𝜎𝑧. The data points are not evenly spaced because the phase shifts are not linearly dependent on the voltages, which are linearly varied, applied to the electro-optic phase modulators. (c) The measured truth table of the CNOT10 gate. (d) The theoretical truth table of the CNOT10 gate.

To simplify the implementation of the gate operations and minimize the optical loss associated with the fiber-based devices, optical circulator and fiber optic retroreflector are used to enable the multipassing of the optical loop in a more compact architecture. The two cnot gates in the modular exponentiation are implemented by an electro-optic polarization switch (3.5-dB insertion loss) and optical delays (fibers). While the first cnot gate double passes the optical delay by using two fiber-based polarizing beam splitters, the second cnot gate passes the optical delay once. After the modular exponentiation, the outcome is analyzed by a time digitizer (100-ps time resolution) and processed by a computer to reveal the result of the factorization.

IV. RESULTS

The single-qubit and two-qubit gates, which compose an universal gate set [48], are carefully characterized in Fig. 4. The measured single-qubit rotations 𝑒𝑖𝜙ˆ𝜎𝑦 and 𝑒𝑖𝜙ˆ𝜎𝑧 on a Bloch sphere are shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. These single-qubit rotations are used not only for implementing arbitrary single-qubit gates but also for calibrating the modulation signals. The measured truth table of the CNOT10 gate is shown in Fig. 4(c), which is in good agreement with the theoretical truth table in Fig. 4(d).

The experimental demonstration of Shor’s algorithm with a single photon is summarized in Figs. 5 and 6. As shown in Figs. 5(b) to 5(d), the initial time-bin modes as well as the output-state probabilities after the first cnot gate and modular exponentiation exhibit excellent visibility with uneven amplitudes. The uneven amplitudes are due to the double-exponential single-photon wave packet [Fig. 5(a)] and the different losses experienced by different time-bin modes. Nevertheless, Fig. 6 shows that the outcome of the argument registers 𝑥2𝑥1𝑥0 after the inverse QFT is in good agreement with the theoretical prediction assuming even amplitudes for the initial time-bin modes. This surprising result is a consequence of the Hadamard operations in the inverse QFT, which equally distribute the interference peaks at 000, 010, 100, and 110. These peaks correspond to 𝑥=𝑐23/𝑟=0,2,4,6, respectively, for integer 𝑐. The case 𝑥=0 is an inherent failure of Shor’s algorithm while the case 𝑥=4 gives the trivial result of the factors 1 and 15. The cases 𝑥=2 and 𝑥=6 result in finding the order (periodicity) 𝑟=4 with the factors gcd(𝑎𝑟/2±1,𝑁)=3 and 5.

FIG. 5.

(a) The wave packet of the narrowband single photons has a double-exponential waveform. The output-state probabilities after the register initialization, first cnot gate, and modular exponentiation are shown in (b)–(d), respectively. The dashed lines indicate the boundaries of the time-bin modes, which correspond to different computational basis states (the order of the qubits are altered for convenience). For the result in (d), a coincidence count rate of 10 counts/s is observed and the statistics is accumulated for 30 min.

FIG. 6.

Experimental order finding after the inverse QFT of Shor’s algorithm. The theory considers initial time-bin modes with even amplitudes.

V. CONCLUSION

In summary, we have implemented Shor’s algorithm with a single photon by encoding and manipulating 32 time-bin modes on the single-photon wave packet. The ability of performing such a complex quantum computing task manifests the powerful information-processing capacity of a single photon in high dimensions. Considering commercially available electro-optic modulators with a 40-GHz bandwidth (EOSPACE, Inc.), encoding more than 5000 time-bin modes on temporally long single photons is possible. The manipulation and noise with the high-dimensional states are usually more troublesome compared to the qubits. Nevertheless, our work shows that the high-dimensional time-bin states of a temporally long single photon can be prepared in a single shot and manipulated by a compact programmable fiber loop. The high-dimensional states may also be manipulated by the high-dimensional quantum gates [8,12] with the single-qudit interferometry replaced by a multiqudit interferometry [34], in which the use of multiple photons provides the scalability. The reduction of the number of single-photon sources and detectors will be beneficial for achieving a higher ratio of the coincidence to accidental counts [21,49–51]. It has also been shown that the high-dimensional states have a higher resistance to quantum channel noise [52–54]. The time-bin-encoded states of temporally long single photons are thus promising for implementing high-dimensional quantum computing.

The authors would like to thank D.-S. Chuu and C.-W. Yang for the insightful discussion. This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (110-2112-M-007-021-MY3, 111-2119-M-007-007, and 112-2119-M-007-007).

References

  1. P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135 (2007).
  2. J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photonics 3, 687 (2009).
  3. T. Ralph and G. Pryde, Optical quantum computation, Prog. Opt. 54, 209 (2010).
  4. T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. O’Brien, Quantum computers, Nature 464, 45 (2010).
  5. S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041303 (2019).
  6. S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, 6412 (2018).
  7. J. T. Barreiro, N. K. Langford, N. A. Peters, and P. G. Kwiat, Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005).
  8. A. Babazadeh, M. Erhard, F. Wang, M. Malik, R. Nouroozi, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, High-dimensional single-photon quantum gates: Concepts and experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180510 (2017).
  9. X.-L. Wang, Y.-H. Luo, H.-L. Huang, M.-C. Chen, Z.-E. Su, C. Liu, C. Chen, W. Li, Y.-Q. Fang, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260502 (2018).
  10. M. Erhard, M. Malik, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement beyond qubits, Nat. Photonics 12, 759 (2018).
  11. T. Giordani, E. Polino, S. Emiliani, A. Suprano, L. Innocenti, H. Majury, L. Marrucci, M. Paternostro, A. Ferraro, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Experimental engineering of arbitrary qudit states with discrete-time quantum walks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 020503 (2019).
  12. X. Gao, M. Erhard, A. Zeilinger, and M. Krenn, Computer-inspired concept for high-dimensional multipartite quantum gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 050501 (2020).
  13. M. Rambach, M. Qaryan, M. Kewming, C. Ferrie, A. G. White, and J. Romero, Robust and efficient high-dimensional quantum state tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 100402 (2021).
  14. R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, W. N. Plick, M. Krenn, C. Schaeff, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum entanglement of high angular momenta, Science 338, 640 (2012).
  15. J. Joo, P. L. Knight, J. L. O’Brien, and T. Rudolph, One-way quantum computation with four-dimensional photonic qudits, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052326 (2007).
  16. C. Reimer, S. Sciara, P. Roztocki, M. Islam, L. Romero Cortés, Y. Zhang, B. Fischer, S. Loranger, R. Kashyap, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. J. Moss, L. Caspani, W. J. Munro, J. Azaña, M. Kues, and R. Morandotti, High-dimensional one-way quantum processing implemented on d-level cluster states, Nat. Phys. 15, 148 (2019).
  17. Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020).
  18. D. Cozzolino, B. Da Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, High-dimensional quantum communication: Benefits, progress, and future challenges, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1900038 (2019).
  19. M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365 (2020).
  20. J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, P. Skrzypczyk, A. Salavrakos, J. Tura, R. Augusiak, L. Mančinska, and D. Bacco, Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics, Science 360, 285 (2018).
  21. Y. Chi, A programmable qudit-based quantum processor, Nat. Commun. 13, 1166 (2022).
  22. X. Gao and Z. Liu, , Universal quantum computation by a single photon, ArXiv:1909.09535.
  23. J. C. García-Escartín and P. Chamorro-Posada, Universal quantum computation with the orbital angular momentum of a single photon, J. Opt. 13, 064022 (2011).
  24. J. Kysela, X. Gao, and B. Dakić, Fourier transform of the orbital angular momentum of a single photon, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 034036 (2020).
  25. K. H. Kagalwala, G. Di Giuseppe, A. F. Abouraddy, and B. E. A. Saleh, Single-photon three-qubit quantum logic using spatial light modulators, Nat. Commun. 8, 739 (2017).
  26. A. F Abouraddy, G. Di Giuseppe, T. M. Yarnall, M. C. Teich, and B. E. A. Saleh, Implementing one-photon three-qubit quantum gates using spatial light modulators, Phys. Rev. A 86, 050303(R) (2012).
  27. L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, G. Breyta, C. S. Yannoni, M. H. Sherwood, and I. L. Chuang, Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance, Nature 414, 883 (2001).
  28. B. P. Lanyon, T. J. Weinhold, N. K. Langford, M. Barbieri, D. F. V. James, A. Gilchrist, and A. G. White, Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of Shor’s algorithm with quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250505 (2007).
  29. C.-Y. Lu, D. E. Browne, T. Yang, and J.-W. Pan, Demonstration of a compiled version of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using photonic qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250504 (2007).
  30. A. Politi, J. C. F. Matthews, and J. L. O’Brien, Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm on a photonic chip, Science 325, 1221 (2009).
  31. P. W. Shor, in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994), p. 124.
  32. P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, J. B. Spring, M. Moore, X.-M. Jin, M. Barbieri, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walmsley, Linear optical quantum computing in a single spatial mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 150501 (2013).
  33. K. R. Motes, A. Gilchrist, J. P. Dowling, and P. P. Rohde, Scalable boson sampling with time-bin encoding using a loop-based architecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120501 (2014).
  34. Y. He, X. Ding, Z.-E. Su, H.-L. Huang, J. Qin, C. Wang, S. Unsleber, C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, X.-L. Wang, W.-J. Zhang, S.-J. Chen, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, L.-X. You, Z. Wang, S. Höfling, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Time-bin-encoded boson sampling with a single-photon device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 190501 (2017).
  35. R. B. Griffiths and C.-S. Niu, Semiclassical Fourier transform for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3228 (1996).
  36. C.-S. Chuu, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, A miniature ultrabright source of temporally long, narrowband biphotons, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 051108 (2012).
  37. C.-H. Wu, T.-Y. Wu, Y.-C. Yeh, P.-H. Liu, C.-H. Chang, C.-K. Liu, T. Cheng, and C.-S. Chuu, Bright single photons for light-matter interaction, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023811 (2017).
  38. C.-S. Chuu and S. E. Harris, Ultrabright backward-wave biphoton source, Phys. Rev. A 83, 061803(R) (2011).
  39. P. Kolchin, C. Belthangady, S. Du, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Electro-optic modulation of single photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 103601 (2008).
  40. S.-W. Feng, C.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Wei, J.-H. Yang, Y.-R. Chen, Y.-W. Chuang, Y.-H. Fan, and C.-S. Chuu, Purification of single photons from room-temperature quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 143601 (2017).
  41. C.-H. Wu, C.-K. Liu, Y.-C. Chen, and C.-S. Chuu, Revival of quantum interference by modulating the biphotons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143601 (2019).
  42. R. Chinnarasu, C.-Y. Liu, Y.-F. Ding, C.-Y. Lee, T.-H. Hsieh, I. A. Yu, and C.-S. Chuu, Efficient generation of subnatural-linewidth biphotons by controlled quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063837 (2020).
  43. C.-Y. Cheng, J.-H. Yang, Y.-J. Chen, C.-H. Wu, C.-N. Wang, and C.-S. Chuu, Time-resolved detection of photon-surface-plasmon coupling at the single-quanta level, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033724 (2020).
  44. C.-S. Chuu, C.-Y. Cheng, C.-H. Wu, C.-Y. Wei, S.-Y. Huang, S.-W. Feng, Y.-J. Chen, and C.-Y. Yang, Purification of single and entangled photons by wavepacket shaping, Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2000122 (2021).
  45. Y.-C. Kao, S.-H. Huang, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Wu, S.-H. Chu, J. Jiang, A.-C. Zhang, S.-Y. Huang, J.-H. Yen, K.-M. Feng, and C.-S. Chuu, Field test of quantum key distribution with high key creation efficiency, Opt. Express 31, 30239 (2023).
  46. C. Chen, X. Ding, J. Qin, Y. He, Y.-H. Luo, M.-C. Chen, C. Liu, X.-L. Wang, W.-J. Zhang, and H. Li, Observation of topologically protected edge states in a photonic two-dimensional quantum walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 100502 (2018).
  47. A. Schreiber, K. N. Cassemiro, V. Potoček, A. Gábris, P. J. Mosley, E. Andersson, I. Jex, and C. Silberhorn, Photons walking the line: A quantum walk with adjustable coin operations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 050502 (2010).
  48. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, in (Cambridge University PressCambridge, U.K.), 2000.
  49. Y. Wang, K. D. Jöns, and Z. Sun, Integrated photon-pair sources with nonlinear optics, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 011314 (2021).
  50. A. Christ and C. Silberhorn, Limits on the deterministic creation of pure single-photon states using parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 85, 023829 (2012).
  51. J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, P. Skrzypczyk, A. Salavrakos, J. Tura, R. Augusiak, L. Mančinska, D. Bacco, D. Bonneau, J. W. Silverstone, Q. Gong, A. Acín, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, J. L. O’Brien, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics, Science 360, 285 (2012).
  52. N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127902 (2002).
  53. N. T. Islam, C. C. W. Lim, C. Cahall, J. Kim, and D. J. Gauthier, Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits, Sci. Adv. 3, e170149 (2017).
  54. F. Bouchard, R. Fickler, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, High-dimensional quantum cloning and applications to quantum hacking, Sci. Adv. 3, e1601915 (2017).
Issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 3 — September 2024

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) Example for manipulating a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes. “Phase” and “Pol.” represent the electro-optic phase and polarization modulators, respectively. The time-bin modes with different phases, which are in one of two orthogonal polarizations, are labeled in different colors. The time delay is implemented in one polarization as indicated by its color. (b) The interferometry after several rounds for a constant time delay and nearest-neighboring mode coupling prepares arbitrary qudit states. The states are in the -level Hilbert space. (c) The mode coupling with variable time delays. (d) Single-qubit unitary rotations , , and for a three-qubit state encoded on eight time-bin modes. (e) Realization of the rotational gates with a single-round operation acting on a qubit state. (f) Two-qubit control unitary gates for a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes. and stand for the control and target qubits, respectively. (g) Realization of the gate for a two-qubit state encoded in four time-bin modes.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Quantum circuit for implementing the compiled version of Shor’s algorithm that factorizes 15. , , and are the argument registers while and are the function registers. is the phase shift .

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Experimental setup of the implementation of Shor’s algorithm in a single photon. The monolithic PPKTP crystal is pumped by a frequency-locked cw laser at 775 nm to generate type-II phase-matched biphotons. The half-wave plate (HWP) aligns the pump polarization to the crystal. A pair of lenses is used to focus the pump beam into the crystal. The long-pass filter (LPF) is placed to filter out the pump. After the polarizing beam splitter (PBS) splits the generated biphoton, the heralded 1550-nm single photons are sent into the fiber-based interferometry for implementing Shor’s algorithm, where AEOM, Pol. EOM, and SPD stand for the electro-optic amplitude modulator, electro-optic polarization modulator (switch), and single-photon detector (15% quantum efficiency, 150-ps timing resolution), respectively. A 200-ns optical delay is used for delaying the single photons.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Characterization of the single-qubit rotations and cnot gate. (a) Single-qubit rotation . (b) Single-qubit rotation . The data points are not evenly spaced because the phase shifts are not linearly dependent on the voltages, which are linearly varied, applied to the electro-optic phase modulators. (c) The measured truth table of the gate. (d) The theoretical truth table of the gate.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    (a) The wave packet of the narrowband single photons has a double-exponential waveform. The output-state probabilities after the register initialization, first cnot gate, and modular exponentiation are shown in (b)–(d), respectively. The dashed lines indicate the boundaries of the time-bin modes, which correspond to different computational basis states (the order of the qubits are altered for convenience). For the result in (d), a coincidence count rate of 10 counts/s is observed and the statistics is accumulated for 30 min.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Experimental order finding after the inverse QFT of Shor’s algorithm. The theory considers initial time-bin modes with even amplitudes.

    Reuse & Permissions
3 of 6
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×